So this week US Navy SEALs did what they do best, better than any fighting force in the world. They swooped into a foreign country, a hostile place, and in darkness, entered an unknown building and killed the most evil terrorist in history. I was fascinated by the reactions when the news broke ... both extremes were unexpected. The people who went to the White House to celebrate and brought a beach ball to throw around, and the people who were deeply saddened by his loss. Saddam Hussain was a violent, repressive dictator who killed and tortured his own people at will, gassed the Kurds in northern Iraq, allowed his sons to make Baghdad their own personal real life Grand Theft Auto game and fired missiles at Israel in a vain effort to destroy them. He would have been more successful with that last bit, but firing SCUDS out of the trunk of your Volvo isn’t all that accurate. He was captured, tried for crimes against humanity , convicted and executed. I honestly do not recall anyone being sad about it, mourning the loss of life. Osama Bin Laden wanted to kill you. He was the unrepentant killer of thousands of people all over the world ... it wasn’t just America he hated ... Saudis, Jews, Shia Muslims, and heretics (a fairly large and extremely subjective group) all were on the hit list.
It dawned on me that people were not aware who he was, that they did not know his history, so here’s the quick version. Osama Bin Laden is the son of an extremely wealthy Saudi construction giant, he was educated in Saudi Arabia and as a young man traveled to Pakistan in order to help the people of Afghanistan fight against the Soviet Union (they had invaded in 1979). Even then, he was not on the front lines, but instead used his families money and influence to recruit fighters to go to Afghanistan. This is during the cold war so of course the United Stated sent money and supplies to “Pakistan” where the ISI (Pakistani secret police) turned them over to Bin Laden and his fighters, provided training and unleashed them on the Soviets. After a decade of futility, with the Soviet Union nearing collapse, the Soviets withdrew and Osama returned to Saudi Arabia where he was greeted as a hero. And then a year later when the Saudis allowed the US to enter and use Saudi territory to fight against Iraq, Bin Laden turned on his king. His ensuing rhetoric against the monarchy got him deported to Sudan and got his passport revoked. He then set out on his next plan, to assassinate the president of Egypt (Hossani Mubarak, remember him?) which failed. He forms a group with his new Egyptian friends and they set out to kill by bombing ships and embassies and civilian targets ... when Sudan decided they didn’t want him around either, he went to the only place on earth that actually wanted the guy around, Afghanistan. Which is when he came up with and executed the 9/11 attacks. And the rest I hope you know, we invaded Afghanistan to root out all the terrorists that had been flown there from all over the world by Bin Laden so they could hide out and 10 years later he was found and was executed.
He never relented from his views or his intentions, he was an unrepentant perpetrator of crimes against humanity, there was no trial necessary, he admitted it multiple times, he was proud of it, and he, having publically plead guilty, received his sentence. So I don’t get the mourners.
On the other hand, he has been hiding and running for a decade, and you know people ... the other terrorists from his group couldn’t go near him, nor did he want them to, it was too risky. So although his organization continued unabated, he was not involved in what was happening, he was trying to stay alive. Al quaida exists and wants you to die a violent death whether Bin Laden is alive or dead. So I don’t get the rejoicing. His death represents the delivery of justice, but in no way changes anything. The war rages on, Islamic terrorists are still scattered all over the globe and are plotting carnage and destruction ... Bin Laden has been out of the picture ever since he became the most wanted man on earth. So, while I certainly do not mourn his loss I do not either rejoice in his death. My brothers and sisters are still half way around the world, in a hostile country, risking their lives every minute in the effort to keep the terrorists from killing my children, or you, or your mother. Which, make no mistake, they want to. America and her sons and daughters represent evil to these people because of our “fornication, homosexuality, intoxication, gambling and usury”, not to mention our decades of meddling in the affairs of Muslim countries. Cold war remnants.
So, where’s the conspiracy in it? There isn’t on. Bin Laden was found and was killed and was tossed off the side of a naval ship once his identity was confirmed. Clean, simple, the picture of American military efficiency.
The interesting part is this, while we are all looking at the successes in the east, the facts are coming out about a tragedy in the American South West. It seems that the Justice Department, an arm of the executive, had their stepson the ATF conduct an operation in an effort to bring Mexican drug cartels to justice. The plan goes like this, recruit US gun distributors to sell to Mexican cartel mules, then track the weapons they purchase and arrest cartel leaders. Great plan. But it all went south, they lost the guns and the cartels used them to kill a multitude of people including two US Border Patrol agents. Well done. So, what does the Justice Department do when it comes to light that US dealers sold the weapons recovered at the scene? They do what any honest, honorable person would do ... publically condemn the dealers that they recruited, call them out by name, besmirch the reputations of the men who objected to being involved in selling assault rifles to foreign criminals ... well, now the truth is coming out, and it looks as if the plan and the coverup may go all the way to the top on this one. Maybe it’s a coincidence that just as congressional hearings looking into the botched operation were set to begin we have some attention grabbing news ....................over here. Or maybe the executive would like for you to talk about something other than the Justice Department assisting in the murders of two of your fellow Americans, the Justice Department’s attempted cover up and their refusal to hand over subpoenaed documents that show who was aware and who authorized this debacle of a mess. Don’t worry, the out of touch, ineffective, figurehead of global Islamic Jihad has been brought to justice... jihad will go on, and the cover up of the cover up will work if you let it.
Politicians operate with complete immunity from their crimes because you let them, their games work because you look where the media tells you to look. Your government is directly responsible for the deaths of two men attempting to serve this nation, and rather than admit it, they are trying to hide it and hoping you don’t notice. Please notice, please care, please don’t elect more of the same every time you go to the polls.
Friday, May 6, 2011
Monday, April 18, 2011
Unemployment? What unemployment?
" In March the unemployment rate fell to 8.7% even though 158,000 jobs were lost and 143,000 jobs were created."
That is a quote from my last post making fun of the math used to determine the unemployment rate. i was trying to point out that when you have more new unemployed people than you do new jobs in a given month then you have MORE unemployed people, and yet the government says the rate comes down. Because they think that we are STUPID.
So, i'm wrong right? Sorry, no, i'm right. Here's the actual quote from the jobs report, "The government says applications for unemployment benefits rose 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 412,000 for the week ended April 9. That left applications at their highest point since mid-February." So that's really bad right? Unless companies hired more than 412,000 people the unemployment rate went up, and that would prove that the recession was continuing unabated. here's the rest of the report, "Companies added more than 200,000 jobs in March for the second straight month, the first time that has happened since 2006. The unemployment rate fell to a two-year low of 8.8 percent and has dropped a full percentage point since November." Do you see what they did there? 412,000 new applications for unemployment and 200,000 new jobs means that there are nearly a quarter of a million more unemployed people that the 1st of March! It does not mean that there are less unemployed people!!!!! 200,000 - 412,000 = BAD
In other news you have been betrayed by your leaders ....... AGAIN! The budget deal is a total con-job, there are no real cuts to spending, a little "enron math" here and some fuzzy rounding there and a pinch of salt and then bake the whole thing for two weeks in the heat created by threatening to shut down the government and what do you have .... the same crap you had before. Awesome. These guys are seriously just crack addicts, but their crack is spending money on non-sense. I told you that voting them out wouldn't work because it's being voted in that makes them this way, you didn't believe me, but here we are, same ol same ol, no end in sight.
Unemployment answers. Everyone wants to know what is going to fix unemployment, and there are all kinds of false claims and bad economic theory floating around out there. Republicans say that if you don't tax rich people and corporations that they will run out and hire millions of people at great salaries and with great benefits. Democrats say that if you raise taxes on rich people and corporations and give that money to people who do not work for it that somehow jobs will magically appear ... oh, wait i remember, the people will spend the money at walmart and then walmart will need new cashiers. Except if you've been to walmart then you know that it does not induce them to hire when they see 40 people in line at one open cash register ... i think they think it's fun.
So what is the answer? Well, there isn't one answer that works all the time. Wars sure help, but not the kind of war we're fighting now, to fix unemployment with a war you need tons on increased military factory work and in order to sustain the employment rate after the war ends you need lots of soldiers to die. I am not advocating that. I love our soldiers, but that was a big part of the post WWII economic boom in the middle class, a reduced labor force drove up wages, it's a simple supply and demand curve, pure 8th grade economics. If there are a total of 10 jobs in the entire economy and there are 30 applicants, the 10 people hired will not be paid well, and if they don't like it they can be replaced by one of the other 20. If there are only 8 applicants for the same 10 jobs then the picture is different, companies are then competing for the available workers and wages and benefits will be higher. Make sense? I hope so. Which brings me to my solution to the current unemployment problem. I maintain that it is not in fact an unemployment problem, it is instead a reduced household income problem. The problem is not lack of jobs, the problem is that people can't pay their bills due to income reductions and the obvious inflation that the government keeps denying. In most households you have two people competing in an over saturated labor market separately, each one being low balled by their employer. So here's the fix. I need about 50 million people to resign from their jobs. I know that sounds crazy, but the sudden creation of massive numbers of job openings will create a hiring may-lay that will result in people being offered huge salaries and great benefits. So if you are currently married to someone who has been unemployed for 2 years and you have been supporting him, you get to be part of the 50 million and he will get a job that pays as much as you used to make combined. No new jobs, but your finances will be as healthy as ever. The real dirty secret of all the talks in Washington is that you cannot "create" jobs. Demand created jobs, demand for products and services. A restrictive tariff might created jobs, stimulus will not. I know that in the current climate it is the height of misogynistic rhetoric to even suggest it, but if we were a nation where the majority of people only were married one time, and one of those people excluded themselves from the work force, i maintain that we would have no economic crisis. Demand would be less and less production would be required. That all people are entering the work force is driving down the price of labor on the market and at the same time driving up the price of all other commodities. So, there, i said it. The solution to our dilemma is single income families with a stay at home parent ... a return to the way it used to be. A return to the old way, stores closed on Sunday, hands on parenting ... first you just have to realize that toughening up women, emasculating men, having cool gadgets, allowing a generation of children to be raised by day care providers and completely withdrawing from your community into your house, into the digital world, none of it is actually progress. They told you it was progress so that you would consume more ... what could sell cars like getting women to go to work? Gas? Mac and Cheese? It's not progress, and the truth is just beneath the surface of all of our problems ... it's the great leap backwards.
That is a quote from my last post making fun of the math used to determine the unemployment rate. i was trying to point out that when you have more new unemployed people than you do new jobs in a given month then you have MORE unemployed people, and yet the government says the rate comes down. Because they think that we are STUPID.
So, i'm wrong right? Sorry, no, i'm right. Here's the actual quote from the jobs report, "The government says applications for unemployment benefits rose 27,000 to a seasonally adjusted 412,000 for the week ended April 9. That left applications at their highest point since mid-February." So that's really bad right? Unless companies hired more than 412,000 people the unemployment rate went up, and that would prove that the recession was continuing unabated. here's the rest of the report, "Companies added more than 200,000 jobs in March for the second straight month, the first time that has happened since 2006. The unemployment rate fell to a two-year low of 8.8 percent and has dropped a full percentage point since November." Do you see what they did there? 412,000 new applications for unemployment and 200,000 new jobs means that there are nearly a quarter of a million more unemployed people that the 1st of March! It does not mean that there are less unemployed people!!!!! 200,000 - 412,000 = BAD
In other news you have been betrayed by your leaders ....... AGAIN! The budget deal is a total con-job, there are no real cuts to spending, a little "enron math" here and some fuzzy rounding there and a pinch of salt and then bake the whole thing for two weeks in the heat created by threatening to shut down the government and what do you have .... the same crap you had before. Awesome. These guys are seriously just crack addicts, but their crack is spending money on non-sense. I told you that voting them out wouldn't work because it's being voted in that makes them this way, you didn't believe me, but here we are, same ol same ol, no end in sight.
Unemployment answers. Everyone wants to know what is going to fix unemployment, and there are all kinds of false claims and bad economic theory floating around out there. Republicans say that if you don't tax rich people and corporations that they will run out and hire millions of people at great salaries and with great benefits. Democrats say that if you raise taxes on rich people and corporations and give that money to people who do not work for it that somehow jobs will magically appear ... oh, wait i remember, the people will spend the money at walmart and then walmart will need new cashiers. Except if you've been to walmart then you know that it does not induce them to hire when they see 40 people in line at one open cash register ... i think they think it's fun.
So what is the answer? Well, there isn't one answer that works all the time. Wars sure help, but not the kind of war we're fighting now, to fix unemployment with a war you need tons on increased military factory work and in order to sustain the employment rate after the war ends you need lots of soldiers to die. I am not advocating that. I love our soldiers, but that was a big part of the post WWII economic boom in the middle class, a reduced labor force drove up wages, it's a simple supply and demand curve, pure 8th grade economics. If there are a total of 10 jobs in the entire economy and there are 30 applicants, the 10 people hired will not be paid well, and if they don't like it they can be replaced by one of the other 20. If there are only 8 applicants for the same 10 jobs then the picture is different, companies are then competing for the available workers and wages and benefits will be higher. Make sense? I hope so. Which brings me to my solution to the current unemployment problem. I maintain that it is not in fact an unemployment problem, it is instead a reduced household income problem. The problem is not lack of jobs, the problem is that people can't pay their bills due to income reductions and the obvious inflation that the government keeps denying. In most households you have two people competing in an over saturated labor market separately, each one being low balled by their employer. So here's the fix. I need about 50 million people to resign from their jobs. I know that sounds crazy, but the sudden creation of massive numbers of job openings will create a hiring may-lay that will result in people being offered huge salaries and great benefits. So if you are currently married to someone who has been unemployed for 2 years and you have been supporting him, you get to be part of the 50 million and he will get a job that pays as much as you used to make combined. No new jobs, but your finances will be as healthy as ever. The real dirty secret of all the talks in Washington is that you cannot "create" jobs. Demand created jobs, demand for products and services. A restrictive tariff might created jobs, stimulus will not. I know that in the current climate it is the height of misogynistic rhetoric to even suggest it, but if we were a nation where the majority of people only were married one time, and one of those people excluded themselves from the work force, i maintain that we would have no economic crisis. Demand would be less and less production would be required. That all people are entering the work force is driving down the price of labor on the market and at the same time driving up the price of all other commodities. So, there, i said it. The solution to our dilemma is single income families with a stay at home parent ... a return to the way it used to be. A return to the old way, stores closed on Sunday, hands on parenting ... first you just have to realize that toughening up women, emasculating men, having cool gadgets, allowing a generation of children to be raised by day care providers and completely withdrawing from your community into your house, into the digital world, none of it is actually progress. They told you it was progress so that you would consume more ... what could sell cars like getting women to go to work? Gas? Mac and Cheese? It's not progress, and the truth is just beneath the surface of all of our problems ... it's the great leap backwards.
Friday, April 8, 2011
Reid, Boehner, Obama ... Get a clue!
Ok, so I didn’t really want to get involved in this because I think I would have to write a book to really explain it all and there have been quite a few complaints that my last couple of blog posts were too long and people were falling asleep while reading them. This becomes a huge problem when you factor in that 12% of pinkosworld readers read while driving and then they fall asleep and crash. I know that you’re wondering how we know that ... we just do, OK?
This week’s post is brought to you by Speciation ...the study of species separated for long periods of time, subjected to vastly different environmental conditions, then brought back together where they do not mate and then some scientists declare them different species and pat themselves on the back for proving evolutionary theory. Which has absolutely nothing to do with the Federal Budget ... unless the government is funding the experiments, which they probably are, so it’s not as bad of a segue as had hoped for, but I hope you’ll agree that it was pretty bad.
Ahhh, the Federal Budget. Let me just say this, I researched this post for one hour (not as long as a normal news post, but I have been really sick and there is so much information out there that I could write ten posts from what I learned in that hour) so in no way does this paint a full picture of what the government spends money on, but my hope is that it is shocking enough to make you really, really angry. I did not get into Social Security or Medicare, I know that that is where most of the money goes, but like I said, I’ve been sick and ... whatever, if you want me to solve those two somebody is going to have to start sending me a paycheck, suffice to say we spend a lot of money on the elderly, we loooove the elderly. $1.6 trillion love.
Here are some of the obsurdities I uncovered in 60 minutes of really hard work, there is a Bureau of the Public Debt ... and they’re on twitter. So that’s reassuring, along with the Office of Thrift Supervision ... wow.
The Department of Education gets $92.9 Billion per year spends $15 billion on “Accelerating Achievement and Insuring Equity” $393 million on “Supporting Student Success” which seem to cover some of the same areas to me and then I have to wonder how effective they are, how much over lap they have, do they both have an administrator and a staff? Oh, and did you know that we spend $234 million per year to fund Howard University? A private college. It doesn’t say why, I suppose it has something to do with historical prejudice at universities, but I went to college and didn’t see much of that still going on. I could be wrong. $234 million? Wow. They spent $750 million to fund “English Learner Education”. Is that ESL? Does the government really spend 3/4 billion dollars to teach people English? Not to brag, but I learned German for the cost of a plane ticket, and a year’s time, but I assume that the beneficiaries of this program are already here, so what’s the money for? They need to go out and mingle a bit. And let us not forget the $1.76 billion for “Salaries and Expenses”. Wow. Double wow. Does that mean that the salaries of the people teaching English in the “English Learner Program” aren’t included in their number?
The Department of Energy gets $30 billion and either don’t publish their budget (required by law?) Or they make it really hard to find.
Here we go with the Department of Labor did you know that your tax dollars insure the pensions of private workers? Seriously, if a pension fund goes broke from mismanagement or graft or whatever the reason, you’re backing it up. The “Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation” gets $7.2 billion per year and spent $2.8 million on supplies and materials and another $8.3 million on equipment. Seriously. $10 million on paper and staplers and laptops and photocopiers and dividers. Wow. There’s a law, you may have heard of it, the Family Medical Leave Act, in case not it basically says that for certain reasons you can leave your job and it must be there for you when you return, which I have always been in favor of because the worker who left would not be paid in their absence which insures as short a leave as is necessary. Not for long, the 2012 DOL budget proposes $23 million for “State paid Leave Fund”. If states want to pay people out on leave, people protected by FMLA, the feds are going to help pick up the tab. That’ll go great, no one is going to abuse that bit of genius. I could never afford paternity leave when my first three children were born, but if you’re going to pay me to hang out with my family for 6 months or so I might seriously consider having some more kids. You know the people who lie every month about unemployment? You know how they say it’s going down because the work force is shrinking (translation-if you’ve been unemployed too long we don’t want to count you anymore so you don’t exist) they get some money too, $655 million for the Office of Labor Statistics. Seriously. I will save the government $654 million dollars and make up some phoney numbers at my kitchen table, I’ll start right now. In March the unemployment rate fell to 8.7% even though 158,000 jobs were lost and 143,000 jobs were created. Where’s my million? But all that waste explains why there is only $ 48 million left over for Veterans Employment and Training. They don’t really need that do they? The Army recruiter said that you would learn something that would be great for you once you got out of the Army, who needs training? Oh, there’s no position open for someone who is exceptional at recognizing enemy combatants in an urban setting? Accuracy with a rifle? Avoiding IED’s? Calling in air strike coordinates? Oh ... sorry, we spent all the real money making up some numbers that help no one, so you’ll have to go work at McDonalds, or you could ... stay in the Army and go back to war.
And I really tried, but I can’t Find Heath and Human Services Budget, which is cool, they only get $854 billion ...no biggie. I will say this, from spending far too much time searching their web site for some answers, the Secretary of HHS, Kathleen Sebelius, really loves herself. Check it out, there’s a whole lot of Kathy on www.hhs.gov.
With all of this I’m just trying to show you that government spending is stupid. There is no oversight, no one is watching to make sure that 15 people aren’t doing the same job ... no one asks, “Is this necessary?” or “Is this the government’s job?”. It’s just yee haw! Let’s do some spendin’!
So as the powers that be sit around Obama’s office and argue about a couple of billion dollars for the rest of the year and hang the pay of the bravest men and wonmen on planet earth in the balance ... I just want to say to them that I am ashamed of each and every one of them. I am ashamed that our nation is run by people who do not care one bit about the American people, I am ashamed that my President has sent my brothers and sisters to fight and die in the four corners of earth without first making sure that their families would be taken care of back home, I am ashamed that the argument is about cutting a few dollars. Do they not see? I spent ONE HOUR analyzing their budget and have found exactly what I thought I would find. Washington spends our money in ways that none of us ever would, Washington passes spending bills with out forethought or afterthought, just vote “yea” and go home. Most of all I am ashamed that they have been able to pacify all of us and do it in front of our faces. Tonight I pray that all of the people serving this nation do not have to worry if their children have food on the table back home, that the leaders of out nation would get this one thing right, and I pray that these same leaders will be inspired not to change the amount they spend, but the entire way they govern.
I hope it was short enough, and you 12% ers need to wait until you get home to read ... or at least until you get to a red light. Happy Friday!
This week’s post is brought to you by Speciation ...the study of species separated for long periods of time, subjected to vastly different environmental conditions, then brought back together where they do not mate and then some scientists declare them different species and pat themselves on the back for proving evolutionary theory. Which has absolutely nothing to do with the Federal Budget ... unless the government is funding the experiments, which they probably are, so it’s not as bad of a segue as had hoped for, but I hope you’ll agree that it was pretty bad.
Ahhh, the Federal Budget. Let me just say this, I researched this post for one hour (not as long as a normal news post, but I have been really sick and there is so much information out there that I could write ten posts from what I learned in that hour) so in no way does this paint a full picture of what the government spends money on, but my hope is that it is shocking enough to make you really, really angry. I did not get into Social Security or Medicare, I know that that is where most of the money goes, but like I said, I’ve been sick and ... whatever, if you want me to solve those two somebody is going to have to start sending me a paycheck, suffice to say we spend a lot of money on the elderly, we loooove the elderly. $1.6 trillion love.
Here are some of the obsurdities I uncovered in 60 minutes of really hard work, there is a Bureau of the Public Debt ... and they’re on twitter. So that’s reassuring, along with the Office of Thrift Supervision ... wow.
The Department of Education gets $92.9 Billion per year spends $15 billion on “Accelerating Achievement and Insuring Equity” $393 million on “Supporting Student Success” which seem to cover some of the same areas to me and then I have to wonder how effective they are, how much over lap they have, do they both have an administrator and a staff? Oh, and did you know that we spend $234 million per year to fund Howard University? A private college. It doesn’t say why, I suppose it has something to do with historical prejudice at universities, but I went to college and didn’t see much of that still going on. I could be wrong. $234 million? Wow. They spent $750 million to fund “English Learner Education”. Is that ESL? Does the government really spend 3/4 billion dollars to teach people English? Not to brag, but I learned German for the cost of a plane ticket, and a year’s time, but I assume that the beneficiaries of this program are already here, so what’s the money for? They need to go out and mingle a bit. And let us not forget the $1.76 billion for “Salaries and Expenses”. Wow. Double wow. Does that mean that the salaries of the people teaching English in the “English Learner Program” aren’t included in their number?
The Department of Energy gets $30 billion and either don’t publish their budget (required by law?) Or they make it really hard to find.
Here we go with the Department of Labor did you know that your tax dollars insure the pensions of private workers? Seriously, if a pension fund goes broke from mismanagement or graft or whatever the reason, you’re backing it up. The “Pension Benefit Guarantee Corporation” gets $7.2 billion per year and spent $2.8 million on supplies and materials and another $8.3 million on equipment. Seriously. $10 million on paper and staplers and laptops and photocopiers and dividers. Wow. There’s a law, you may have heard of it, the Family Medical Leave Act, in case not it basically says that for certain reasons you can leave your job and it must be there for you when you return, which I have always been in favor of because the worker who left would not be paid in their absence which insures as short a leave as is necessary. Not for long, the 2012 DOL budget proposes $23 million for “State paid Leave Fund”. If states want to pay people out on leave, people protected by FMLA, the feds are going to help pick up the tab. That’ll go great, no one is going to abuse that bit of genius. I could never afford paternity leave when my first three children were born, but if you’re going to pay me to hang out with my family for 6 months or so I might seriously consider having some more kids. You know the people who lie every month about unemployment? You know how they say it’s going down because the work force is shrinking (translation-if you’ve been unemployed too long we don’t want to count you anymore so you don’t exist) they get some money too, $655 million for the Office of Labor Statistics. Seriously. I will save the government $654 million dollars and make up some phoney numbers at my kitchen table, I’ll start right now. In March the unemployment rate fell to 8.7% even though 158,000 jobs were lost and 143,000 jobs were created. Where’s my million? But all that waste explains why there is only $ 48 million left over for Veterans Employment and Training. They don’t really need that do they? The Army recruiter said that you would learn something that would be great for you once you got out of the Army, who needs training? Oh, there’s no position open for someone who is exceptional at recognizing enemy combatants in an urban setting? Accuracy with a rifle? Avoiding IED’s? Calling in air strike coordinates? Oh ... sorry, we spent all the real money making up some numbers that help no one, so you’ll have to go work at McDonalds, or you could ... stay in the Army and go back to war.
And I really tried, but I can’t Find Heath and Human Services Budget, which is cool, they only get $854 billion ...no biggie. I will say this, from spending far too much time searching their web site for some answers, the Secretary of HHS, Kathleen Sebelius, really loves herself. Check it out, there’s a whole lot of Kathy on www.hhs.gov.
With all of this I’m just trying to show you that government spending is stupid. There is no oversight, no one is watching to make sure that 15 people aren’t doing the same job ... no one asks, “Is this necessary?” or “Is this the government’s job?”. It’s just yee haw! Let’s do some spendin’!
So as the powers that be sit around Obama’s office and argue about a couple of billion dollars for the rest of the year and hang the pay of the bravest men and wonmen on planet earth in the balance ... I just want to say to them that I am ashamed of each and every one of them. I am ashamed that our nation is run by people who do not care one bit about the American people, I am ashamed that my President has sent my brothers and sisters to fight and die in the four corners of earth without first making sure that their families would be taken care of back home, I am ashamed that the argument is about cutting a few dollars. Do they not see? I spent ONE HOUR analyzing their budget and have found exactly what I thought I would find. Washington spends our money in ways that none of us ever would, Washington passes spending bills with out forethought or afterthought, just vote “yea” and go home. Most of all I am ashamed that they have been able to pacify all of us and do it in front of our faces. Tonight I pray that all of the people serving this nation do not have to worry if their children have food on the table back home, that the leaders of out nation would get this one thing right, and I pray that these same leaders will be inspired not to change the amount they spend, but the entire way they govern.
I hope it was short enough, and you 12% ers need to wait until you get home to read ... or at least until you get to a red light. Happy Friday!
Sunday, April 3, 2011
A moment away from politics
Darwinism, once banned from public schools in this country, is now accepted as fact. Secular academia is arrogant and pompous and in their effort to be all knowing and a pillar of knowledge they have hitched their wagon to Darwin’s theory and are letting it run. In the early days it was considered blasphemy, then it was debated and then somewhere along the way it has been introduced as the new creation-ism (no evidence, but must be believed), and it requires a whole bunch of faith to believe in evolution.
I do not believe that it is blasphemy to study and ask questions about how the earth functions and how it came to be as it is, I’m not even going to go so far as to say that my opinion is correct (obviously I think that it is), but certainly all you scientists and amateur scholars of atheism could come up with something better in the past 150 years, couldn’t you?
First we must, as in all things, question the source. Where does the information disseminate from and what to the vocal supporters have to gain from spreading their theories as fact. In some cases it is money, if you are looking for grant money and donations to find “the missing link” it sure helps if the whole world believes that there is something to find. If Darwinism is a fact then there must be, it becomes a simple problem of finding it. In other cases there is an alterior motive. Godlessness. If you want the world to reject God, to move forward past “silly superstition” them you have to replace creation and God Himself with something. Evolution and science slide in to some pretty big shoes and if they are presented at the right angle, they appear to fill them, but they don’t.
Before you get all excited and have to breathe into a paper bag let me explain something, natural selection (the basis of Darwin’s theory) exists and it does cause slow and dramatic changes within species. This makes sense and is used as the jumping off point for the rest of the nonsense. If there is a population of giraffes with varying neck lengths and they suffer from environmental hardships in the form of a food shortage, in the ensuing years this giraffe population eats everything with in reach of their little mouths, it stands to reason that eventually only the longest necked giraffes will get to eat and therefore be strong enough to procreate and if these conditions continue long enough the short necked giraffes will be bred into non existence. Not extinction, and this is an important distinction, they were all giraffes and their physical appearance has changed, but they are still giraffes. Natural selection like this can be caused by a variety of circumstances, slow cheetah eventually cannot catch enough food to survive and do not reproduce, dark colored polar bear can not stalk their prey, tuskless elephants cannot defend themselves sufficiently (this one actually is playing itself out in reverse as you read this. Poachers have decimated the tusked African elephant population and the offspring of the remaining elephants are being born without tusks) and on and on and on. For every imaginable external stress an organism can be put under there seems to be a universal ability to rise up and meet the challenge, to adapt and continue. This is the universally undisputed portion of Darwin’s work ... and from there the proponents of evolution ask you to make one heck of a leap. The odd thing is that it may not sound crazy to you, there was a time when it made perfect sense to me, it was what I had been taught and I never really thought about it. The leap is from adaptation to evolution. From species slowly changing better meet the challenges that a population faces thru selective breeding to species actually becoming different species. You have evolved from monkeys, your salamander evolved from dinosaurs, or is it prehistoric fish? I’m not really sure which ... and neither are they. They talk about “the missing link” and what that is is the blended human, an organism that is more human that neanderthal man but less human that you are. Finding this organism would prove their theory correct, not that they need to prove it at this point, it is being taught in every educational institution on planet earth as gospel. What they fail to mention, the dirty omitted little secret is that they haven’t found the missing link for any current organism. When you begin to really think about all the verifiable facts that are presented there are huge gaping holes in all of it. The dinosaurs suffered a massive extinction and they also evolved ... huh? Did they die off or did they evolve into something else? I know that a really smart Darwinist will say both, some dinosaurs died off and some evolved into ... something else. It wasn’t just dinosaurs that died off, it was everything, plants, fish, birds ... and they all evolved? Really? At its core, the idea that life began in the ocean and thru millions of years of environmental stress developed the ability to breathe air and grew legs is asinine! To suggest that it was some sort of crazy accident of probability is just reaching for anything to fit the theory, a desperate attempt to tie up the loose ends, to drown out opposing view points. It is very difficult to perform a population study of a million generations to see what anomalies might present themselves. But I will say this, if legs and breathing air are just a silly accident, in order for things to be as they are today you would need billions of silly accidents. Live birth of mammals is a sticky one, a female of a species would simultaneously have to accidently carry its offspring to full term and also accidently develop the ability to produce milk. That’s a tough one, it would have to be a single organism ... not gradual. Any species with unusual fertilization processes would require a male and a female to have the same billion to one accident simultaneously, for example the red velvet mite, which is as big as one of the letters in this sentence, has a peculiar mating habit. The male releases its sperms on small twigs or stalks in what scientists call the "love garden", then lays down an intricate silken trail to the spot. When a female stumbles upon this trail, she will follow it to seek out the "artist". If she likes his work, then she will sit on the sperm. However, if another male spots the garden, he will trash it and lay his own instead! Did they have a meeting and decide that from now on this would be the new way? The un-leap-able hurdle of evolutionary theory is that one species cannot become another species, sure there are changes over time, but a giraffe is still a giraffe ... and will never become a hippopotamus. Even if we wait a billion years.
So, if a fish cannot become a land walking, air breathing mammal/bird/reptile/insect then of course an amoeba cannot become a fish. And that kills Darwin. The book he wrote, his life’s work was entitled “Origin of the Species” and that is what he was theorizing, he used his extensive study of slight changes in populations over time and the idea of natural selection and he made the leap that human beings used to be monkeys and then of course that monkeys used to be something before that and that thing used to be something else and you can continue to traced it all back to the oldest fossils ever found which are single celled organisms. And that was the beginning.
That a single celled organism could evolved in to the immeasurably diverse ecosystem doesn’t seem strange to you? That organism evolved chlorophyll and became a plant and also evolved a brain and muscles and bones and became you and also evolved an exoskeleton and became a butterfly?
Which gets us to the biggest hole of all, don’t ask a Darwinist for the answer to this one, because you will either get a response so stupid that you will get a headache or they will tell you that their theory that explains everything that has ever happened with every creature on the entire planet for all of history, hasn’t found the answer yet. Where did the single celled organism come from? It’s the old chicken and the egg dilemma ... the two most common explanations of Darwinists are these, lightning struck “ooze” and thus formed the ooze into a simple lifeform, or that life was introduced to the planet by extraterrestrial means. Lightning? Struck the ooze? And formed a cell wall, a nucleus and digestive capabilities? Really? I’ve never seen lightning build anything before, or even organize it ... that’s a good one.
I’m not even going to get into Mr Dawkins extraterrestrial nonsense. But I will say this, if the origin of life on earth is life on another planet you have not dodged a bullet, you still have to explain the life on the other planet. Maybe there is more constructive lighting on that planet.
I propose this to you, I know it is old fashioned, and considered the height of ancient ignorance, but I propose it anyway. God created the universe, the earth, everything on it and He did so intentionally. The bombardier beetle is not an accident ... “The spray is produced within a pair of chambers in the beetle’s abdomen. One of these chambers contains hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone. The other chamber contains two enzymes called catalase and peroxidase. If another insect threatens the bombardier beetle, the beetle will respond by mixing the two chemicals. The enzymes cause the hydrogen peroxide to decompose into water and oxygen. This chemical reaction releases heat, which raises the fluid and gas inside the chamber to 100 degrees Celsius - in other words, boiling. The boiling temperature causes the oxygen gas to expand. The expanding gas forces the fluid out at the offending predator.” Really? An insect developed the ability to create chemicals inside of its body and also developed the physiology to store them, mix them and then excrete them thru a series of happy little accidents?
I see the Creator’s hand everywhere I look at the natural world, the balance of ecosystems in a world ruled by entropy, the perfect beauty of countless creatures, the immeasurable usefulness of the most unexpected actors. Maybe you don’t see it how I do, maybe the Creator is not obvious to you, and that’s fine with me, I don’t even consider it blasphemy ... but for God’s sake come up with something better that Darwinism, come up with a theory that explains something, anything, God knows that Darwin didn’t.
I do not believe that it is blasphemy to study and ask questions about how the earth functions and how it came to be as it is, I’m not even going to go so far as to say that my opinion is correct (obviously I think that it is), but certainly all you scientists and amateur scholars of atheism could come up with something better in the past 150 years, couldn’t you?
First we must, as in all things, question the source. Where does the information disseminate from and what to the vocal supporters have to gain from spreading their theories as fact. In some cases it is money, if you are looking for grant money and donations to find “the missing link” it sure helps if the whole world believes that there is something to find. If Darwinism is a fact then there must be, it becomes a simple problem of finding it. In other cases there is an alterior motive. Godlessness. If you want the world to reject God, to move forward past “silly superstition” them you have to replace creation and God Himself with something. Evolution and science slide in to some pretty big shoes and if they are presented at the right angle, they appear to fill them, but they don’t.
Before you get all excited and have to breathe into a paper bag let me explain something, natural selection (the basis of Darwin’s theory) exists and it does cause slow and dramatic changes within species. This makes sense and is used as the jumping off point for the rest of the nonsense. If there is a population of giraffes with varying neck lengths and they suffer from environmental hardships in the form of a food shortage, in the ensuing years this giraffe population eats everything with in reach of their little mouths, it stands to reason that eventually only the longest necked giraffes will get to eat and therefore be strong enough to procreate and if these conditions continue long enough the short necked giraffes will be bred into non existence. Not extinction, and this is an important distinction, they were all giraffes and their physical appearance has changed, but they are still giraffes. Natural selection like this can be caused by a variety of circumstances, slow cheetah eventually cannot catch enough food to survive and do not reproduce, dark colored polar bear can not stalk their prey, tuskless elephants cannot defend themselves sufficiently (this one actually is playing itself out in reverse as you read this. Poachers have decimated the tusked African elephant population and the offspring of the remaining elephants are being born without tusks) and on and on and on. For every imaginable external stress an organism can be put under there seems to be a universal ability to rise up and meet the challenge, to adapt and continue. This is the universally undisputed portion of Darwin’s work ... and from there the proponents of evolution ask you to make one heck of a leap. The odd thing is that it may not sound crazy to you, there was a time when it made perfect sense to me, it was what I had been taught and I never really thought about it. The leap is from adaptation to evolution. From species slowly changing better meet the challenges that a population faces thru selective breeding to species actually becoming different species. You have evolved from monkeys, your salamander evolved from dinosaurs, or is it prehistoric fish? I’m not really sure which ... and neither are they. They talk about “the missing link” and what that is is the blended human, an organism that is more human that neanderthal man but less human that you are. Finding this organism would prove their theory correct, not that they need to prove it at this point, it is being taught in every educational institution on planet earth as gospel. What they fail to mention, the dirty omitted little secret is that they haven’t found the missing link for any current organism. When you begin to really think about all the verifiable facts that are presented there are huge gaping holes in all of it. The dinosaurs suffered a massive extinction and they also evolved ... huh? Did they die off or did they evolve into something else? I know that a really smart Darwinist will say both, some dinosaurs died off and some evolved into ... something else. It wasn’t just dinosaurs that died off, it was everything, plants, fish, birds ... and they all evolved? Really? At its core, the idea that life began in the ocean and thru millions of years of environmental stress developed the ability to breathe air and grew legs is asinine! To suggest that it was some sort of crazy accident of probability is just reaching for anything to fit the theory, a desperate attempt to tie up the loose ends, to drown out opposing view points. It is very difficult to perform a population study of a million generations to see what anomalies might present themselves. But I will say this, if legs and breathing air are just a silly accident, in order for things to be as they are today you would need billions of silly accidents. Live birth of mammals is a sticky one, a female of a species would simultaneously have to accidently carry its offspring to full term and also accidently develop the ability to produce milk. That’s a tough one, it would have to be a single organism ... not gradual. Any species with unusual fertilization processes would require a male and a female to have the same billion to one accident simultaneously, for example the red velvet mite, which is as big as one of the letters in this sentence, has a peculiar mating habit. The male releases its sperms on small twigs or stalks in what scientists call the "love garden", then lays down an intricate silken trail to the spot. When a female stumbles upon this trail, she will follow it to seek out the "artist". If she likes his work, then she will sit on the sperm. However, if another male spots the garden, he will trash it and lay his own instead! Did they have a meeting and decide that from now on this would be the new way? The un-leap-able hurdle of evolutionary theory is that one species cannot become another species, sure there are changes over time, but a giraffe is still a giraffe ... and will never become a hippopotamus. Even if we wait a billion years.
So, if a fish cannot become a land walking, air breathing mammal/bird/reptile/insect then of course an amoeba cannot become a fish. And that kills Darwin. The book he wrote, his life’s work was entitled “Origin of the Species” and that is what he was theorizing, he used his extensive study of slight changes in populations over time and the idea of natural selection and he made the leap that human beings used to be monkeys and then of course that monkeys used to be something before that and that thing used to be something else and you can continue to traced it all back to the oldest fossils ever found which are single celled organisms. And that was the beginning.
That a single celled organism could evolved in to the immeasurably diverse ecosystem doesn’t seem strange to you? That organism evolved chlorophyll and became a plant and also evolved a brain and muscles and bones and became you and also evolved an exoskeleton and became a butterfly?
Which gets us to the biggest hole of all, don’t ask a Darwinist for the answer to this one, because you will either get a response so stupid that you will get a headache or they will tell you that their theory that explains everything that has ever happened with every creature on the entire planet for all of history, hasn’t found the answer yet. Where did the single celled organism come from? It’s the old chicken and the egg dilemma ... the two most common explanations of Darwinists are these, lightning struck “ooze” and thus formed the ooze into a simple lifeform, or that life was introduced to the planet by extraterrestrial means. Lightning? Struck the ooze? And formed a cell wall, a nucleus and digestive capabilities? Really? I’ve never seen lightning build anything before, or even organize it ... that’s a good one.
I’m not even going to get into Mr Dawkins extraterrestrial nonsense. But I will say this, if the origin of life on earth is life on another planet you have not dodged a bullet, you still have to explain the life on the other planet. Maybe there is more constructive lighting on that planet.
I propose this to you, I know it is old fashioned, and considered the height of ancient ignorance, but I propose it anyway. God created the universe, the earth, everything on it and He did so intentionally. The bombardier beetle is not an accident ... “The spray is produced within a pair of chambers in the beetle’s abdomen. One of these chambers contains hydrogen peroxide and hydroquinone. The other chamber contains two enzymes called catalase and peroxidase. If another insect threatens the bombardier beetle, the beetle will respond by mixing the two chemicals. The enzymes cause the hydrogen peroxide to decompose into water and oxygen. This chemical reaction releases heat, which raises the fluid and gas inside the chamber to 100 degrees Celsius - in other words, boiling. The boiling temperature causes the oxygen gas to expand. The expanding gas forces the fluid out at the offending predator.” Really? An insect developed the ability to create chemicals inside of its body and also developed the physiology to store them, mix them and then excrete them thru a series of happy little accidents?
I see the Creator’s hand everywhere I look at the natural world, the balance of ecosystems in a world ruled by entropy, the perfect beauty of countless creatures, the immeasurable usefulness of the most unexpected actors. Maybe you don’t see it how I do, maybe the Creator is not obvious to you, and that’s fine with me, I don’t even consider it blasphemy ... but for God’s sake come up with something better that Darwinism, come up with a theory that explains something, anything, God knows that Darwin didn’t.
Sunday, March 6, 2011
On Why Unions are to Blame for Wisconsin
When I was 16 years old I read the Communist Manifesto and it forever changed my outlook on the world. Before, I knew things were made, but it never occurred to me to think about how they were made, by whom, and to who’s benefit. It never occurred to me to consider labor a commodity, and while I always was sympathetic to the working poor, I guess I just assumed that they always had been and always would be. Marx’s words opened my eyes to the possibility that something could be done about it, real change could be made, real people could have a better future. I searched for people who saw things as I did, and found them ... in dusty old books, and no where else.
When I was 18 years old I went to college and discovered the proverbial pot at the end of the rainbow. There was an organization there call the Student Labor Action Coalition (hereafter SLAC). I had discovered Poe’s el Dorado, I was a student and labor action was a passion that I had been waiting to unleash for two long years. I gleefully joined and went to the first meeting ... I sat quietly and listened, at first in apprehension expecting to hear wisdom and bravery and big plans and big action, then in horror as I sat and listened to bickering and nonsense and inane plans to boycott Disney and picket the local Disney store in solidarity to Costa Rican factory workers making Aladdin pajamas.
When I was 19 years old I was the President of SLAC, for the first time I would be manning the helm, there were 12 dedicated soldiers in my SLAC army and I knew that we would march on to triumphant victory ... I reversed course and set out to do meaningful things. At our first meeting I announced that we would not be involved in any more boycotts nor would we participate in the “Free Tibet” rally, instead we would be moving to organize the cafeteria workers and the cleaning service employees of the college. We would be getting them full time status and health benefits and actually improve actual people’s lives. The announcement was not met with the passionate excitement that I had expected, I looked out to the blank stares of the 12 soon to be ex coalition members. It was the last SLAC meeting.
When I was 20 I met Joe. Joe was an organizer for the AFL-CIO ... he had no address, he rode an old motorcycle, he wore a leather jacket and jeans and a t-shirt. I wanted to BE him and settled to know him. Between stints riding his motorcycle off into the sunset to deliver equality and a living wage to the working poor all over our great nation he would come to town and tell me what was going on out there. We would drink coffee on a little terrace and he would chain smoke Drum that he rolled himself and I would ask rapid fire questions, just soaking the poetic romance of it all. When the time came for him to ride off again I would go back to studying International Labor Relations and Statistics and Calculus and I would stare out the window imagining Joe walking through the fields of a Georgia peanut farm, workers gathered around, giving speeches that would fit perfectly into a John Steinbeck novel. That spring I was beyond words when I was invited to come to South Carolina to help organize the resort workers of Hilton Head , golf caddies and valets and bell boys, room maids, laundry workers, waiters and bartenders. To my utter dismay we did not ride off into the sunset on matching motorcycles but instead in some weird guy’s Dodge Caravan, the two young rabble rousers, the old weirdo and the lingering odor of a dead wet dog that seemed to get worse the further south we drove. The third day of handing out fliers I was approached by a newly organized union member with a minor, legitimate, complaint. He had already gone to his rep and was ignored and wanted to know if I could help. “Of course I can” I knew I could, I knew people, real union people, people who were as passionate as I was. That evening I went to my contact at the AFL-CIO with the young man’s issue, I was sure that it would be resolved and I fantasized that the lazy rep would be reprimanded or maybe fired ... instead I was told to “forget that non-sense” and worry about getting more people to sign up instead. I won’t repeat all that was said because in my heart I still hope that he was only speaking for himself, even if in my head I think that he wasn’t. The next morning I took the bus back north, I never saw Joe again.
When I was 21 and working in a bakery in Atlanta I was standing next to a young, pregnant, Mexican (legal) co worker when a pan that was just out of the oven slid off of a rack towards her and she instinctually caught it with both arms, giving her 3rd degree burns. After the boss told her she had not worked there long enough to qualify for worker’s comp and sent her home, about an hour later, I was fired for telling her the truth, giving her the number to call, sending her to the clinic and then telling the boss what I thought of him and what he had tried to do.
For the past 10 years I have worked for one of the largest corporations in the world, day in and day out, with skilled labor. Never, in my entire life, have I seen anyone as concerned with the well being of workers health, safety and treatment as the faceless multinational corporation I work for. Managers who neglect their workers education and development are chastised and disciplined for it, the workers receive annual reminders of their benefits and options, they are encouraged to invest in the matched 401k, the company offers scholarships for their children and God help the manager who oversees workers who are hurt at work. No, it’s not benevolent ... the faceless corporation knows that these people are valuable assets in need of protection, thru experience they have found that treating workers right and paying them a living wage is the best way to keep them working, productive. Over the past decade as the workers benefits have improved, management’s have been slowly stripped away. We no longer have a pension waiting for us at the end, it became too expensive to fund it any more. Our health insurance covers less and less every year while it costs more and more ... and we’re not special, so it goes at most companies all across our nation. The American people have lost hope in retirement, private pension have gone the way of the dodo, and the ponzi scheme of social security has shown its ugly face, unsustainable, not long for this world. Tonight, as the sun sets, workers all over the country will go to be well cared for with no hope of a pension and with the understanding that with each year that passes their remaining benefits will cost them more that the year before.
Except union workers. Their pension are contractual and will be paid until the pension funds go bankrupt ... which will happen. Except government workers, for them the pension fund is tax revenue and they will collect until our nation goes bankrupt.
Unions have spent 100 years fighting for wages and benefits for their members, making production so expensive that it is now cheaper to make things in China/Costa Rica/Burma/anywhere, then ship them here, even with the tariffs designed to discourage companies from outsourcing. American cars are built in Canada and Mexico, Korean cars in Alabama, Japanese cars in Tennessee, German cars in South Carolina, but the UAW is looking around confused, telling its members, the laid off, foreclosed upon masses, that it’s the greedy companies’ fault.
So now the government workers benefits are under assault and there are no cries of support form the country at large, the rest of the country is watching in scorn as the protesters march because they’re only being asked to do what we were asked to do a long time ago, work harder, produce more, and get less in return. Frankly, we’re sick of paying for it, sick of paying for something that we will never have, the unions missed the boat, because when it was happening to us, they were fighting to get their people more, as economic forces have cost me half my pay and forced 14 million Americans into unemployment and made my benefits more expensive the government workers have gotten cost of living raises ... where was the AFL-CIO and SEIU when my pension was canceled, the same place they are now that it’s their turn. The unions have turned their back on America by ignoring reality, by enforcing sweetheart contracts through their friends in government, by refusing to allow for the fact that the world had changed. When unemployment and foreclosure and property tax default soared years ago, the writing was on the wall, cuts were coming and the unions did not act. No suggestions, no plan ... just get what we can while we can, full speed ahead.
In Wisconsin the governor had choices to make and he proposed an end to the collective bargaining rights of unions or layoffs to close the budget gap, and the union shouted NEITHER! NO! America is not outraged on the union’s behalf just as they were not outraged on our behalf, it is high time that the medicine be taken. So, although I dearly love teachers (both those who taught me, and my friends and family who teach) and I dearly love police and firemen (friends and family who serve their communities) and I dearly love those who work in government (my Aunt) .... if the money is not there, then the money is not there. In 2010 I made half of what I made in 2005 and my benefits now cost double what they did then, I work the same 60 hour work week and have the exact same job ... and I know I am among the lucky ones who have a job. Public union members, be glad that you are only being asked to pay a bit more, that you are only being asked to give up a little, the rest of us have had to give up much, much more. Now, put your signs down and get back to work.
When I was 18 years old I went to college and discovered the proverbial pot at the end of the rainbow. There was an organization there call the Student Labor Action Coalition (hereafter SLAC). I had discovered Poe’s el Dorado, I was a student and labor action was a passion that I had been waiting to unleash for two long years. I gleefully joined and went to the first meeting ... I sat quietly and listened, at first in apprehension expecting to hear wisdom and bravery and big plans and big action, then in horror as I sat and listened to bickering and nonsense and inane plans to boycott Disney and picket the local Disney store in solidarity to Costa Rican factory workers making Aladdin pajamas.
When I was 19 years old I was the President of SLAC, for the first time I would be manning the helm, there were 12 dedicated soldiers in my SLAC army and I knew that we would march on to triumphant victory ... I reversed course and set out to do meaningful things. At our first meeting I announced that we would not be involved in any more boycotts nor would we participate in the “Free Tibet” rally, instead we would be moving to organize the cafeteria workers and the cleaning service employees of the college. We would be getting them full time status and health benefits and actually improve actual people’s lives. The announcement was not met with the passionate excitement that I had expected, I looked out to the blank stares of the 12 soon to be ex coalition members. It was the last SLAC meeting.
When I was 20 I met Joe. Joe was an organizer for the AFL-CIO ... he had no address, he rode an old motorcycle, he wore a leather jacket and jeans and a t-shirt. I wanted to BE him and settled to know him. Between stints riding his motorcycle off into the sunset to deliver equality and a living wage to the working poor all over our great nation he would come to town and tell me what was going on out there. We would drink coffee on a little terrace and he would chain smoke Drum that he rolled himself and I would ask rapid fire questions, just soaking the poetic romance of it all. When the time came for him to ride off again I would go back to studying International Labor Relations and Statistics and Calculus and I would stare out the window imagining Joe walking through the fields of a Georgia peanut farm, workers gathered around, giving speeches that would fit perfectly into a John Steinbeck novel. That spring I was beyond words when I was invited to come to South Carolina to help organize the resort workers of Hilton Head , golf caddies and valets and bell boys, room maids, laundry workers, waiters and bartenders. To my utter dismay we did not ride off into the sunset on matching motorcycles but instead in some weird guy’s Dodge Caravan, the two young rabble rousers, the old weirdo and the lingering odor of a dead wet dog that seemed to get worse the further south we drove. The third day of handing out fliers I was approached by a newly organized union member with a minor, legitimate, complaint. He had already gone to his rep and was ignored and wanted to know if I could help. “Of course I can” I knew I could, I knew people, real union people, people who were as passionate as I was. That evening I went to my contact at the AFL-CIO with the young man’s issue, I was sure that it would be resolved and I fantasized that the lazy rep would be reprimanded or maybe fired ... instead I was told to “forget that non-sense” and worry about getting more people to sign up instead. I won’t repeat all that was said because in my heart I still hope that he was only speaking for himself, even if in my head I think that he wasn’t. The next morning I took the bus back north, I never saw Joe again.
When I was 21 and working in a bakery in Atlanta I was standing next to a young, pregnant, Mexican (legal) co worker when a pan that was just out of the oven slid off of a rack towards her and she instinctually caught it with both arms, giving her 3rd degree burns. After the boss told her she had not worked there long enough to qualify for worker’s comp and sent her home, about an hour later, I was fired for telling her the truth, giving her the number to call, sending her to the clinic and then telling the boss what I thought of him and what he had tried to do.
For the past 10 years I have worked for one of the largest corporations in the world, day in and day out, with skilled labor. Never, in my entire life, have I seen anyone as concerned with the well being of workers health, safety and treatment as the faceless multinational corporation I work for. Managers who neglect their workers education and development are chastised and disciplined for it, the workers receive annual reminders of their benefits and options, they are encouraged to invest in the matched 401k, the company offers scholarships for their children and God help the manager who oversees workers who are hurt at work. No, it’s not benevolent ... the faceless corporation knows that these people are valuable assets in need of protection, thru experience they have found that treating workers right and paying them a living wage is the best way to keep them working, productive. Over the past decade as the workers benefits have improved, management’s have been slowly stripped away. We no longer have a pension waiting for us at the end, it became too expensive to fund it any more. Our health insurance covers less and less every year while it costs more and more ... and we’re not special, so it goes at most companies all across our nation. The American people have lost hope in retirement, private pension have gone the way of the dodo, and the ponzi scheme of social security has shown its ugly face, unsustainable, not long for this world. Tonight, as the sun sets, workers all over the country will go to be well cared for with no hope of a pension and with the understanding that with each year that passes their remaining benefits will cost them more that the year before.
Except union workers. Their pension are contractual and will be paid until the pension funds go bankrupt ... which will happen. Except government workers, for them the pension fund is tax revenue and they will collect until our nation goes bankrupt.
Unions have spent 100 years fighting for wages and benefits for their members, making production so expensive that it is now cheaper to make things in China/Costa Rica/Burma/anywhere, then ship them here, even with the tariffs designed to discourage companies from outsourcing. American cars are built in Canada and Mexico, Korean cars in Alabama, Japanese cars in Tennessee, German cars in South Carolina, but the UAW is looking around confused, telling its members, the laid off, foreclosed upon masses, that it’s the greedy companies’ fault.
So now the government workers benefits are under assault and there are no cries of support form the country at large, the rest of the country is watching in scorn as the protesters march because they’re only being asked to do what we were asked to do a long time ago, work harder, produce more, and get less in return. Frankly, we’re sick of paying for it, sick of paying for something that we will never have, the unions missed the boat, because when it was happening to us, they were fighting to get their people more, as economic forces have cost me half my pay and forced 14 million Americans into unemployment and made my benefits more expensive the government workers have gotten cost of living raises ... where was the AFL-CIO and SEIU when my pension was canceled, the same place they are now that it’s their turn. The unions have turned their back on America by ignoring reality, by enforcing sweetheart contracts through their friends in government, by refusing to allow for the fact that the world had changed. When unemployment and foreclosure and property tax default soared years ago, the writing was on the wall, cuts were coming and the unions did not act. No suggestions, no plan ... just get what we can while we can, full speed ahead.
In Wisconsin the governor had choices to make and he proposed an end to the collective bargaining rights of unions or layoffs to close the budget gap, and the union shouted NEITHER! NO! America is not outraged on the union’s behalf just as they were not outraged on our behalf, it is high time that the medicine be taken. So, although I dearly love teachers (both those who taught me, and my friends and family who teach) and I dearly love police and firemen (friends and family who serve their communities) and I dearly love those who work in government (my Aunt) .... if the money is not there, then the money is not there. In 2010 I made half of what I made in 2005 and my benefits now cost double what they did then, I work the same 60 hour work week and have the exact same job ... and I know I am among the lucky ones who have a job. Public union members, be glad that you are only being asked to pay a bit more, that you are only being asked to give up a little, the rest of us have had to give up much, much more. Now, put your signs down and get back to work.
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Doing the "blogger thing"
So you all know that i don't do the "blogger thing" but somehow (through the generosity of a good friend) i was awarded an award. "The Stylish Blogger Award" Now i am not stylish nor do i seem to write about anything with any kind of mass appeal, but i won and there are rules: (although i must add that Little Yawps broke rule #4 and failed to contact me.)
So here are the rules for acceptance of the award:
1. Thank and link back to the person who awarded you this award.
2. Share 7 things about yourself.
3. Award 5 recently discovered great bloggers.
4. Contact these bloggers and tell them about the award. Thank you Jen at Little Yawps (the link is below)
My Seven Things:
1. I am charming but obnoxious. (and that comment alone personifies what i mean)
2. I am passionate about many things, none of which benefit me professionally in any way, and i would like to change that.
3. I have three great daughters and i am the biggest overprotective jerk dad in the world, that's not an apology, i am a total ass when it comes to my kids and i'm not sorry about it. I am the same way with my wife to a lesser extent (cuz she can handle herself), but i love her and can bring out the king kong of jerk if you upset her.
4. I just found out, after 30 years of refusing to eat it, that i LOVE broccoli if it is raw. And i have set out to make up for lost time by eating my body weight in florettes over the last few months.
5. I talk and act and look like i have a PhD, but i sell tires for a living. I am learned without the proper documentation, like an illegal alien of academia.
6. I live in Florida but wish that i lived somewhere else, anywhere else ... seriously, anywhere. I have a friend who's husband runs a company in a central Asian country (-24 degrees F) and i sent him an e-mail to see if they were hiring. I haven't heard back yet, but i'm seriously ready to go.
7. I love to read and will read any non-fiction i can find, which drives my wife nuts because our bank has an on going used book sale to benefit such and such and i bring home 3-4 books every week (hard covers are 50 cents), and the books are taking over the house. Some she throws out when i'm at work, she doesn't think that i know, but i do.
The Five Bloggers Who I Can’t Stop Coming Back To are:
i don't have five ... so i'll give you my 3 and two that are just cool but i don't read
http://littleyawps.wordpress.com/ the most awesome, schizophrenic, ironic, down right hysterical, blog out there. If you don't read it already you are sorely missing out.
http://lovelaughterandonecrazylife.blogspot.com/ the best tales of the adventures of a mom and her kids and husband and life in general. Honest and funny and cute ... and it has its own sound track which is cool. Of course she hasn't written since June, but if you go check it out and demand more i bet she'll oblige us.
http://caffeinatedcrossings.blogspot.com/ Not prolific, but the writing itself is stunning and descriptive and beyond professional.
http://www.shitmykidsruined.com/ pretty self explanatory ... you're gonna laugh!
http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/ no opinion, just the facts, numbers and it is simple and beautiful ... the opposite of pinkosworkd (all opinion)
Democracy is Great, unless ...
I just want to start off by saying that nothing I have ever seen in my entire life on 3 continents has ever been quite so ridiculous as “pro-democracy” protesters and their world wide supporters celebrating the installation of “temporary” military rule in Egypt. I’m sorry if you’re buying the media coverage of the events in Egypt and think that some how that the people have won and defeated a bad dictator ... because that is not what happened.
Egypt: A Brief History of the Presidency
The first President of a modern free Egypt was Muhammad Naguib, who was an Army officer prior to Britain’s withdrawal, the second president was Gamal Abdel Nasser who was an Army officer prior to becoming president, the third president was Anwar al Sadat who was an Army officer prior to becoming president and the fourth president was Hosani Mubarak who was ... you’ll never guess ... an Army officer prior to becoming president. When he resigned he turned over power to his recently appointed vice president Omar Sulieman (army officer) who then turned over power to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces.
The military has run Egypt since 1953, and it’s not going to change now, you can have all the elections you want, you can talk until you are blue in the face about the Muslim Brotherhood and the possible Islamification of Egypt, but at the end of the day it is the army that will decide the next president and the next and the next and so forth and so on. After a week of being head of state General Mohamed Hussain Tantawi has declared that labor and civil unrest will no longer be tolerated and that everyone need to go back to work .... hooray democracy!
So the American news media spent two weeks canonizing the Egyptian protesters and tell us how fantastic they were, so when the attacked Lara Logan, beat her and brutally sexually assaulted her, the language used to describe the horrible attack was so muted and shaded it was obscene. The crowd forcibly removed her from her crew and her security detail, NBC reported the she “became separated” and then she was brutally attacked and sexually assaulted by “a separate violent element”. So good, it wasn’t the wonderful protesters you were telling us about, it was someone else ... that’s good to know. There is a picture taken seconds before the attack and I can tell from the giant democracy protest sign that they are holding that it wasn’t the same people, clearly a separate violent element.
So now there are protests and clashes in Bahrain, Yemen, Iran, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, and of course don’t forge the Tunisian thing from last month, and if you’re a geography student then you know all of this is right next to the bastions of stability Sudan, Somalia, Chad, Iraq and Afghanistan. Basically a 3500 mile swath of equatorial Asia and Africa are exploding in unrest and chaos and violence (4000 miles if you count the unreported, disastrous regime change in Kyrgyzstan). So what are we to do? President Obama says he supports to protesters for democracy ... in a place that polls repeatedly to be in favor of the destruction of our nation and our way of life ... so that’s odd. Add the head of or nation’s intelligence tells the world that he doesn’t really know what’s going on and it’s all a big surprise and the Muslim Brotherhood is a good bunch of guys, like the Knights of Columbus ... do you believe that? Do you believe he’s incompetent? Then there’s the little matter of the leaked cable (thanks wikileaks) detailing how the US state department was collaborating with elements inside Egypt to plan and carry-out a revolution in early 2011 back in 2008. But everyone was caught off guard and they loved Mubarak, or hated him, no wait, he’s great, no ... no he’s got to go.
So where’s it all going? I’ll keep looking and I’ll let you know as soon as I do, but just don’t believe the hype, the result of all this is not going to be a free and prosperous northern Africa/Middle East.
Egypt: A Brief History of the Presidency
The first President of a modern free Egypt was Muhammad Naguib, who was an Army officer prior to Britain’s withdrawal, the second president was Gamal Abdel Nasser who was an Army officer prior to becoming president, the third president was Anwar al Sadat who was an Army officer prior to becoming president and the fourth president was Hosani Mubarak who was ... you’ll never guess ... an Army officer prior to becoming president. When he resigned he turned over power to his recently appointed vice president Omar Sulieman (army officer) who then turned over power to the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces.
The military has run Egypt since 1953, and it’s not going to change now, you can have all the elections you want, you can talk until you are blue in the face about the Muslim Brotherhood and the possible Islamification of Egypt, but at the end of the day it is the army that will decide the next president and the next and the next and so forth and so on. After a week of being head of state General Mohamed Hussain Tantawi has declared that labor and civil unrest will no longer be tolerated and that everyone need to go back to work .... hooray democracy!
So the American news media spent two weeks canonizing the Egyptian protesters and tell us how fantastic they were, so when the attacked Lara Logan, beat her and brutally sexually assaulted her, the language used to describe the horrible attack was so muted and shaded it was obscene. The crowd forcibly removed her from her crew and her security detail, NBC reported the she “became separated” and then she was brutally attacked and sexually assaulted by “a separate violent element”. So good, it wasn’t the wonderful protesters you were telling us about, it was someone else ... that’s good to know. There is a picture taken seconds before the attack and I can tell from the giant democracy protest sign that they are holding that it wasn’t the same people, clearly a separate violent element.
So now there are protests and clashes in Bahrain, Yemen, Iran, Libya, Syria, Lebanon, and of course don’t forge the Tunisian thing from last month, and if you’re a geography student then you know all of this is right next to the bastions of stability Sudan, Somalia, Chad, Iraq and Afghanistan. Basically a 3500 mile swath of equatorial Asia and Africa are exploding in unrest and chaos and violence (4000 miles if you count the unreported, disastrous regime change in Kyrgyzstan). So what are we to do? President Obama says he supports to protesters for democracy ... in a place that polls repeatedly to be in favor of the destruction of our nation and our way of life ... so that’s odd. Add the head of or nation’s intelligence tells the world that he doesn’t really know what’s going on and it’s all a big surprise and the Muslim Brotherhood is a good bunch of guys, like the Knights of Columbus ... do you believe that? Do you believe he’s incompetent? Then there’s the little matter of the leaked cable (thanks wikileaks) detailing how the US state department was collaborating with elements inside Egypt to plan and carry-out a revolution in early 2011 back in 2008. But everyone was caught off guard and they loved Mubarak, or hated him, no wait, he’s great, no ... no he’s got to go.
So where’s it all going? I’ll keep looking and I’ll let you know as soon as I do, but just don’t believe the hype, the result of all this is not going to be a free and prosperous northern Africa/Middle East.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
